This year's tech news, in brief

This perhaps goes against the grain of this blog somewhat, but… Good grief, I’m getting bored with tech / web stories lately!

It’s not that there aren’t new ones to read – quite the reverse. The sheer quantity never changes much. But somehow the content doesn’t change much either, at base. Almost every new story I read could be one of any number of other stories I’ve read before – with nothing changed except the website / company / app involved, the conclusion to the new scientific study, or the version number of the product it’s going on about. To paraphrase Yogi Berra: it’s just déjà vu, all over again.

So to save everyone the bother of reading the 90%+ of it that’s seemingly stuck on a loop, here, in no particular order, is the coming year’s tech news:

  • 2009 2010 2011 will be the year of hyper-local / the semantic web / Web 3.0
  • Apple / Microsoft to release new product / new version of old product
  • New Apple / Microsoft product has minor / major fault
  • Feverish, mainly groundless speculation about next new Apple product starts up again [see also: Microsoft, but much less feverish]
  • Google wants to buy Company X
  • Company X resists Google’s overtures
  • Google buys Company X
  • New Google product, based on code from Company X, not the Facebook-killer / Apple-competitor analysts insist Google is definitely working on; Google shrugs, says that was never the intention
  • X is the new y
  • X isn’t the new y
  • X is brilliant, but what will happen when its venture capital runs out?
  • X is overvalued
  • Is the ‘tech bubble’ back?
  • Video games / the internet / social networking bad for us, according to latest study / book
  • Video games / the internet / social networking good for us, according to latest study / book
  • Correlation is the new causation [the Daily Mail position on tech*, and anything else]
  • Human behaviour / human nature never really changes, just the technology we invent to enact it [the Clay Shirky position on tech scares]
  • Thing that wasn’t in the cloud is now in the cloud
  • Is our data safe in the cloud?
  • Established website / company is losing popularity
  • Established website / company does x in attempt to revive popularity
  • Established website / company is still losing popularity, but even more so
  • Facebook tweaks yet another thing / adds new service, causes outcry about compromised privacy [see also: Google, but less often]
  • Google is evil
  • Google isn’t evil
  • Suggestion is made that tech debate shouldn’t be so reductively binary, no-one listens
  • Social media makes political protest easier, more effective
  • Social media’s influence on politics and protests is overstated / counter-productive
  • Important person at Apple / Google / Microsoft retires, leaves, or moves to Apple / Google / Microsoft
  • Traditional media / music industry / publishing is dying
  • Traditional media / music industry / publishing still isn’t dead yet
  • Satirical zombie movie to be made about traditional media / music industry / publishing
  • Remark on Twitter / Facebook is mistaken for news
  • Remark on Twitter / Facebook is mistaken for news
  • Remark on Twitter / Facebook is mistaken for news

Lather, rinse, repeat – ad nauseam, ad absurdum, ad redcutio, etc. and so on. Or until 2012, at the very least. Probably.

And in other news:
The Weekly Links Post will return soon. Because I’m a hypocrite.

*Not that real newspapers aren’t sometimes guilty, too. Especially in pretty much any story that begins: “A new scientific study…”


More posts you might like…

Content and cognitive load: how to craft your copy for the human brain

The human brain only has so much space to concentrate on different ideas – and if you ask it to do too much, it'll probably stop paying attention altogether. So, how do you stop readers tuning out from your content? John explores cognitive load theory, and how you can use it to create brain-friendly copy...
B2B writing quality checklist

Reviewing B2B copywriting? Steal our 15-point quality checklist

Here's a secret: writing B2B content is hard... and reviewing it is even harder. So to help, we score every draft on a 15-point scale. And we're happy for you to make it your own.

Make your writing more effective

Get copywriting tips and advice — direct to your inbox every month: