Expert Q&A: Irene Triendl on turning marketing strategies into standout content plans

The most valuable B2B content is closely aligned with the strategy of your business. Your marketing strategy helps bridge the gap between the two. But there’s a subtle art to translating a marketing strategy into a strong content plan.

To get some expert advice on how to do that, we recently sat down with Irene Triendl, one of the smartest marketing and content strategists we know. In Irene’s own words, she helps B2B companies figure out what to say, to whom, and in what order.

Here’s a quick look at our conversation.

Radix: Hi Irene, great to speak to you again! If marketers are creating content plans from scratch, where should they begin?

Irene: It might seem a bit obvious, but the first thing you’ll need if you want to deliver great B2B marketing content is a clearly defined marketing strategy.

You’d think that’s a given, but in a lot of technology businesses, there’s little trust placed in marketing teams. Technical decision-makers may want to sign everything off themselves, and, while they might have an idea of the kind of marketing strategy they should pursue, this is often only in their minds – not shared with the marketing team. Naturally, that’s a major hindrance to marketers’ effectiveness and ability to deliver great results.

With no strategy, everything you do will be ad hoc and in response to short-term needs. That pushes you into a loop of continuous firefighting, so major overarching goals like creating awareness or driving demand for specific solutions go unaccomplished.

Radix: So, if a marketing strategy is incomplete or non-existent, what should marketers make sure they clarify before they build a content plan?

Irene: Frustratingly, it’s often the most important elements of a marketing strategy that go overlooked or under-defined. It’s all too common to find that strategies don’t clearly define marketing goals, target audiences, or common objections and blockers, for example. Why people don’t buy is at least as important as why they do.

Value propositions are another area with a lot of room for improvement. Leaders often define them from a product perspective, but don’t explain why a customer should care. If your value propositions talk about you or your products more than what you do for customers, something has gone wrong.

If any of those things aren’t immediately obvious and available to you as a marketer, you’ll need to ask the right questions to establish them before you jump into building a content plan.

Radix: Once a marketer has finally got all of that defined, what comes next? How does their content plan start to take shape?

Irene: Your marketing strategy lays out what you want to achieve. So, the first thing you need to do is work out exactly how content can help you achieve that. For example, if your goal is for decision-makers in your target industry to recognise your name, your content might be a highly visual, targeted brand campaign; if the goal is to build authority, it might be a series of in-depth blog posts co-authored with subject-matter experts from your business.

Next, you’ll need to do some prioritising. If you’re starting from scratch, it’s worth focusing your efforts and budget on content that tells your core story in a clear and consistent way before you move onto more trend-based content, or content that speaks to just one of your audiences. Get your foundation in place and then build around that.

With a clear view of how content can help you achieve your marketing goals, and a prioritised list of the initial content you need to tell your core story, you’ve already got the makings of an effective and actionable content plan.

Radix: Content plans must vary a lot between teams and organisations. How can a marketer tell whether theirs is ‘correct’?

Irene: As you say, what’s right for one organisation won’t necessarily be right for another. But invariably, the best and most effective content plans are clearly mapped to marketing and business strategies, make it clear how they’ll deliver value, and are realistically deliverable with your budget and resources.

Radix: Obviously you’ve got a lot of experience creating content plans that meet those criteria. Do you have any top tips to share with our readers to help them do the same?

Irene: Sure, I think I’ve probably got a few to share.

Number one, if things feel overwhelming, break them down into manageable chunks. Starting from scratch is a daunting prospect, but you really can start very small. Just focus on telling your most important stories – things like who you’re for, the problems you solve, and how your approach is different – in ways that support your biggest goals and take things step by step.

Number two, make the most of the expertise in your business to make sure you’re going to the right people with the right messages in the right way. Build relationships with key SMEs early, and use content to build their profile in your industry. If you do that well, you can turn them into valuable advocates for your content and wider marketing plans.

And finally, it’s also important to connect your work to business results and think about how you’ll define and measure success. And don’t forget to celebrate your successes loudly to make sure people understand the value you’re delivering, so you can maintain buy-in for your content efforts.

 

Also in the series

We spoke to Stephanie Wisdom about how to keep your B2B content fresh, agile and focused on what really matters – your customers. Read the Expert Q and A with Stephanie.

 

Reviewing B2B copywriting? Steal our 16-point quality checklist

In any industry where quality matters, there are a series of objective tests that a product has to pass before it’s released. But somehow, assessing B2B marketing content still seems to be a highly subjective process.

Maybe there’s a belief that creative work is exempt from objective judgement, or a fear of provoking arguments and resentment among writers and stakeholders. Still, nobody reviewing B2B writing seems to have a clear idea of what good looks like.

And that’s ironic. Because in most other contexts, a simple checklist of definable yes/no tests – making quality a little less subjective – is precisely the thing that prevents disagreement.

At Radix, we challenged the idea that evaluating writing is only ever subjective. So, we created a clear, 16-point QA checklist that’s inspired by the process we follow for all our internal reviews – the ones our content leads do before the client sees the work.

Our QA process helps to safeguard quality, but it also improves consistency across our writing team by highlighting areas for development in both writers’ work and client briefs.

And it works so well that we want to share it with you.

B2B Content Marketers checklist for assessing quality technology copywriting

A 16-point quality check for your B2B content

The questions you can use to guide your reviews are grouped into five tests, reflecting the five key B2B copywriting competencies: accuracy, clarity, authority, empathy, and wizardry.

Test A: Accuracy

Q1: Is the copy free from factual errors?

Readers won’t take your content seriously if it’s littered with factual inaccuracies or (worse) straight-up lies. This is basic integrity.

Q2: Have you screened for typos, grammatical errors, and spelling mistakes?

Writers and marketers are only human, and typing is hard. But your reader may not be forgiving, so take the time to proof thoroughly.

Note: If you’re using the QA checklist to identify issues for development, you’ll need a scoring threshold that separates consistent errors from occasional slips. If you’re interested, our wording is: “Are there two typos or fewer per 500 words AND is the copy free from grammatical and spelling errors (that aren’t obvious typos)?”

Q3: Does the piece meet the technical requirements (word and character count limits, templates, style guide, SEO)?

This might seem niche, but it’ll save a lot of headaches when you come to upload documents into your CMS or pass your copy on to designers. The point to take away is that the copy needs to meet the technical requirements of the format.

Plus, adhering to file-naming conventions makes managing content easier for everyone.

(So far, so good. The first three questions should ensure your copy is error-free. But we’re just getting started…)

Test B: Clarity

Q4: Does the copy have a logical structure that presents a compelling argument?

Usually, a B2B decision-maker isn’t interested in reading meandering walls of copy or navigating subversive storytelling approaches. Your content can be long, but you must take your reader with you. That means you need a strong structure that always makes sense.

Q5: Is the point of the piece obvious – from the start and throughout the narrative?

If you’ve got to the end of the introduction and aren’t sure why you should continue reading, or if the piece completely tails off towards its conclusion, the result is the same: you’ve lost your reader. (And your mark for this question.)

Q6: Is every sentence easy to read?

If you find yourself rereading sentences, tripping over grammar, or referring to Google to understand the language, the piece won’t work. If your reader is a senior decision-maker, time-poor, or reading on a mobile device, that only adds to the pressure to ease the cognitive load.

The “every sentence” part of the question sets an incredibly high bar – B2B tech can be complex – but this is important, so we make no apologies for that.

Test C: Authority

Q7: Is there appropriate use of technical or industry terms that are relevant for the intended audience?

There’s no point claiming expertise if you don’t speak your reader’s language. If the content is for a specialist B2B audience, the writer will likely need to use relevant technical jargon where appropriate. And they’ll need to handle it correctly – too much B2B content sprays industry terms around to mask a lack of confidence, and it always shows.

Q8: Are the claims supported by evidence and specific details?

Talk is cheap, so ensure every claim is specific and appropriately sourced. Don’t just say it’s fast; say how fast. Don’t say a viewpoint is widely acknowledged; link to an example. If there are references to studies or ongoing news stories, ensure the sources cited are the most recent available.

Q9: Is the copy free from waffle, hyperbole, clichés, and overly formal language?

Hyperbole fails when it promises the impossible (inflated language makes you less believable). If the writer seems too in love with their thesaurus, they might be making up for lack of relevant knowledge.

“If you care about being thought credible and intelligent, do not use complex language where simpler language will do.” Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow

Test D: Empathy

Q10: Is there evidence that the writer understands the target audience?

This is fundamental to effective B2B marketing content. If the brief failed to define the audience, the writer should’ve pushed back before they even got close to writing.

Q11: Does the piece avoid making assumptions about the audience?

This is a tricky one. When you’ve done your audience research, it’s easy to go too far and lapse into telling the reader what they must think. Some writers will do this without realising, but making ill-advised assumptions only alienates the audience or dilutes the piece’s credibility.

Q12: Are the content and tone appropriate to the audience’s interests, priorities, and knowledge level?

How many B2B content pieces aimed at a particular sector start by defining the market or saying why it’s important? Newsflash: if you work there, you already know.

You need to understand your audience’s knowledge and awareness level. This is partly about the language, of course. But it’s also about being excited by the right things and going beyond features and benefits to understand the real difference a product, service, or idea will make to someone’s working life.

Test E: Wizardry

Q13: Does the piece offer original insight and value to the reader?

Not every piece needs to reinvent the wheel, but it does need to offer tangible value to the reader – and more content pieces fail on this count than any other. It might be new primary research, an original point of view, or a handy 16-point checklist (ahem), but the reader needs to gain something in return for their time.

Q14: Is it written in the right voice?

This is a little easier if you only write for one brand, but still, the piece needs to sound right. If you cover up the branding, is it still clear who’s speaking? Whether you’re writing on behalf of a brand or by-lining to an individual, reading should feel like the client is sitting in your head, dictating it to you.

Q15: Is it engaging and enjoyable to read? And is it likely to incite readers to action?

Place yourself in the reader’s shoes. Does the end arrive quicker than you thought, or does it seem like hard work? Do you naturally want to take the next step, whatever that may be?

What interests this audience may bore you to tears, but if a piece is well written, you should be able to get to the end and say, “Yes, that would work for me if I was a slurry engineer.” If that’s the case, then hey, good stuff.

Q16: And most importantly… Does the piece meet the brief and reflect the right messaging?

After meeting all the points above, it’s important to consider whether the piece reflects the initial brief. If your answer is no, you must take a few steps back and identify where you went wrong.

Even if you’ve produced the most well-written blog post of the year, it won’t be useful to your client – or your campaign – if it doesn’t reflect what you set out to achieve.

If your content scores 16/16, it’s ready to go…

Having reviewed thousands of pieces of content to date (from individual emails to messaging frameworks and entire websites), we find that this checklist works pretty well as a scoring tool.

Your needs might differ; some questions could be more relevant than others. You may also have technical requirements that require greater nuance.

If that’s the case, feel free to download our B2B content scoresheet and make your own version. Maybe you’ll want to change the questions or weight the scoring somehow. Get creative.

But the point is this: asking clear, objective questions makes it much easier to tell whether your content works and reduces the number of arguments you’ll have about preferences. It can help you spot issues and change how you brief, write, and review. And ultimately, it’ll stop you from rushing out weak content.

If it helps to improve the quality of B2B tech content overall, then by all means, steal away. We’ll be delighted.

A matter of death and life: The Radix rebrand

2024 was transformational for Radix, and not always in ways that we wanted. We entered 2025 with new clients, new services, and new momentum, but also with a significantly smaller team.

Even as we tried to roll with the punches and learn all the lessons – agency friends, please don’t underestimate how many obstacles an acquisition can put between your favourite clients and their ability to give you work – we were pushing forward with a long overdue project:

Refreshing the Radix brand.

Living both these stories at the same time has often been a jarring experience.

Workshops. Font shops. Pulling out the stops.

Taken in isolation, everything about the rebrand was a joy.

We asked the amazing Laura Stripp to shepherd us towards a new visual identity. We imagined ourselves as hummingbirds, corkscrews, and Frank Lloyd Wright’s marvel of organic architecture, Falling Water. We shopped for the perfect typeface.

Lewis Davis then developed a completely new, much more elegantly appointed website, designed by Laura to bring her vision for our brand identity to life – and to the public.

The simple need for new copy also drove us to reconsider our core proposition. We found we could voice, more clearly than ever, what the brilliant B2B marketers in the technology companies and agencies we support really value about our copywriting and content strategy services.

It was thrilling to see Radix’s future rapidly coming to life.

The dissonance creeps in

But when I stepped out of our visual identity workshops and looked at the emails in my inbox, I found myself suddenly back in that other narrative: the story of a company making incredibly difficult decisions to weather unusually challenging times.

It’s hard to explain how those of us who led the rebrand felt, and the dissonance of striving to rearticulate our business’s identity, even as we lost some of the people who had, for a long time, helped to make Radix, Radix.

While we knew we were doing genuinely vital work, devoting our energy to a project that wouldn’t bear fruit for many months sometimes felt like a luxury. There was just so much that needed our attention in the here and now.

Branding as a matter of death and life

Today, almost halfway through 2025, my feelings have changed.

For me, and I believe, for the rest of our team, the challenges we had to overcome last year have made this rebrand much more meaningful.

So often, overhauling your visual identity and web presence is about giving a fresh lick of paint to a decades-old machine. For us, it became about giving the correct shape to something genuinely exciting and new.

Radix, reincarnated, is much closer to the Radix we imagined in our branding workshops.

We’re more agile and industrious. More perfectly designed to perform our explicit function. More seamlessly and sustainably attuned to our surroundings.

We’re a hummingbird, carrying a corkscrew, through a modern woodland home.

USPs? Oh, let us tell you about our USPs…

New Radix is even more endlessly tried-and-tested than the much-loved pair of hiking boots that were mentioned in our branding workshops.

Right now, all but one of our writers have over eight years’ B2B tech writing experience. The other has almost four, and frankly, can go toe-to-toe with the industry’s best. It’s a powerhouse writing team that still offers the capacity, flexibility, and industry expertise to help our clients achieve their content ambitions.

The freedom to shape our destiny

There’s one other thing I need to mention.

We’ve been able to choose the kind of business we are – one that prioritises sustainability, provides progressive benefits, and focuses on excellence – because we’re employee-owned. I believe the fact that we all have a say in our agency’s future allows us to respond to challenging times and bounce back even stronger, like few other companies can.

If you’re reading this and want to know more about what employee ownership means, reach out. I’m always happy to evangelize.

Radix is dead. Long live Radix.

Thanks for reading. If you want to see what a lovely job Laura and Lewis have done, have a look around. And if you want to create amazing B2B tech marketing content – just get in touch.