Radix Copycast Episode 25: Creating truly useful B2B marketing content

 

Useful content is essential to good content marketing. It’s about giving away a bit of your expertise to help your audience do their job more easily or to make better decisions. The aim is to build an appreciative community of fans who will one day come to buy a product or service from you.

But in practice, useful content can be hard to create. It’s more than just a blog post that discusses a current industry trend or a SlideShare highlighting a specific issue. From ROI calculators and how-to guides to workbooks and checklists, useful content is content that actually, practically helps people do their job better. And getting it right means really getting to grips with what your audience needs.

In this episode, Fiona and I explore how to identify content ideas that are useful and how to go about writing them.

Listen now to find out:

  • The hallmarks of truly ‘useful’ content
  • What you can do to identify ideas for useful content that your audience wants
  • The best formats for useful content
  • Tips on writing useful content
  • … and more

Download the episode here (right-click and “save as” to download). Or listen in the player at the top of the page.

You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes here.

Alternatively: add our RSS to your preferred podcast player.

Music by Industrial and Marine.

Useful links

Velocity’s B2B Content Marketing Strategy Checklist

fridaygirl.com’s Admin 101

Part of our funnel is missing: 3 kinds of asset content marketing forgot

The Funnel is a frankly pathetic metaphor for the way marketers want buyers to move from stranger to prospect to lead to customer to advocate.

Problem is, it’s still how most people plan their marketing content.

As Velocity’s Doug Kessler pointed out in his inimitable way, funnels tend to have gravity on their side, and aren’t, on the whole, particularly leaky. (What goes in the top of a funnel is sure to come out of the end pretty soon… if only sales funnels were so reliable.)

The Funnel model is so limited, in fact, that Workbrands would rather talk about a water park, giving buyers options, routes, support and the chance to ride more than once. Sounds like fun to us.

In truth, The Funnel is a 92-year-old* cockroach that simply refuses to die. Limitations or not, it’s still the model everyone uses. It’s clear, it’s simple and – ahem – it makes for a cracking board game.

And that’s fine(ish).

But when you use The Funnel to plan your marketing content – as a lot of marketers do – you’re bound to miss some fairly important stuff.

TOFU, MOFU and BOFU are only half the story

Let’s recap. It’s common for content marketers planning an editorial calendar to try to cover the whole funnel with lovely content:

TOFU     The top of the funnel. Prospects barely even know who you are, let alone want to buy from you. Your job is to get into their consideration set, get their details and start a conversation.

TOFU tactics include: thought leadership blogs, social media, slideshare rants, infographics

MOFU   The middle of the funnel. The prospect has realised they have a problem, and it’s one you can probably solve. They might be putting together a shortlist of vendors.

MOFU tactics include: ebooks, case studies, workbooks, videos, “how to” blogs

BOFU     The bottom of the funnel – now you’re selling. Assets need to be carefully aligned with sales, and focused towards building a business case, helping prospects through practicalities, and ultimately winning the contract.

BOFU tactics include: whitepapers, checklists, comparison charts, buyers’ guides

All very important, and very useful. But we know the funnel is just part of the content marketing story – the inbound bit – and, like Joe Pulizzi said, that isn’t enough.

If you’re focusing only on TOFU, MOFU and BOFU, you don’t have all the content you need. So let’s meet their charmingly-named cousins…

Say hello to PREFU, REFU and POFU

Most of the people you’ll do business with in the medium to long term are not in your funnel right now. Some have already been through, converted (hurrah), and are customers. Others have just left it… or maybe they’re nowhere near it just yet.

These contacts are where next year’s revenue is coming from. So what kinds of content will you give them now?

PREFU – people who are nowhere near your funnel (yet)

Some companies aren’t in the market for what you’re selling. Maybe they’re not big enough or at that stage of maturity yet. Perhaps they haven’t even noticed the pain that you solve. Could be they simply can’t afford you just now.

They’re not leads – in fact, they’re not even suspects yet. And in a world of limited resources, sales can’t talk to many people in that category… but marketing can.

If you’re interesting (dare I say it, even entertaining) and demonstrably helpful, expert and informed, a little marketing content can go a long way towards building awareness, and a good impression, in the hearts and minds of people on the fringes of your market, who might be customers later.

REFU – or the dark art of staying friends with your ex

As we’ve established, your funnel has holes in it. Lots of them. Face it: it’s more like a funnel-shaped colander. The point is, there are many reasons why a prospect mightn’t turn into a sale.

Maybe there were internal changes. Or perhaps the budget got used up. Who knows, they might have even (whisper it quietly) chosen a competitor instead this time. One way or another, the sale isn’t happening – but that doesn’t mean they’ll never be in your market in future. After all, haven’t they shown they’re just the sort of company who might buy from you??

The question now is how to get your brand into prime position next time around – to keep in touch, keep building engagement, and eventually get them back into the funnel once more. That’s where your REFU content comes in.

Effective REFU (Return-to-the-Funnel) content depends on the reason you lost the sale: hints, tips and guides to help when a new incumbent’s honeymoon period ends, or assets to help your contact build a better business case. Use data you’ve collected but, crucially, respect the decision your contact has made – don’t be pushy.

POFU – they’ve bought from you. Well done. What now?

The most neglected bit of content marketing – arguably, any marketing – is what happens after the sale. How do you a turn a one-off customer into a fruitful, long-term relationship – and an ambassador for your brand in turn?

Among all the many kinds of marketing content we’re asked for, almost none is aimed at existing customers – that’s left to account management teams. It doesn’t seem to compute that – just maybe – they need just as much marketing support as sales.

Who’s done the most to prove they’re the kinds of customer who’d buy from you? The people who already have. So keep them happy, help them to make the absolute most of their purchase, broaden their relationship with you, and watch the repeat business, upsell opportunities and referrals roll in.

(If in doubt: dig into your data, and compare leads’ conversion rates by their source. If you’re not more likely to convert a referral than anything else, I’ll buy a hat and eat it.)

POFU (Post-Funnel) content needn’t be rocket science: newsletters, ideas, updates, user guides and events. Build relationships, and an interactive community to foster a sense of belonging… involve your customers in content creation, too.

What works for you?

How do you make sure your content covers all eventualities – and what kinds of content work best? We’d love to hear your PREFU, REFU and POFU ideas (or names for other bits of the funnel we might have missed… do your worst!).

Drop us a line on Twitter.

*Yep, the idea of the sales funnel first appeared in a bond sales book in 1924.

reddit v Quora: how can you use them in B2B marketing?

reddit calls itself “the front page of the internet”. It’s like a massive global forum that has sub forums for just about anything.

Alexa, as I write this, ranks it as the 9th most popular website in the US and 31st globally.

Quora says its mission is “to share and grow the world’s knowledge.” It’s a huge question-and-answer repository of knowledge. Alexa ranks it as the 127th most popular website in the world.

David McGuire, Radix’s Creative Director, told me he’s heard reddit might be useful for B2B marketing, but the site absolutely terrifies him. Quora? Zero opinion.

Keep on reading to find out what both platforms are like, how you can use them in your B2B content marketing efforts and why you might want to go with one over the other.

As a B2B content marketer, I use both

I’ve been on both sites for four years, so I’m pretty well placed to tell you what they’re like, how you can use them for B2B content marketing (and how you shouldn’t), and why you might go with one over the other.

Full disclosure: I use reddit a lot more than Quora and I was once a moderator of a large subreddit (like an online forum). This is not to say that reddit is better for B2B marketers; I just mainly have a Quora account so I can fully view site content.

The differences between reddit and Quora

reddit is made up of subreddits: communities of users (known as redditors) who discuss a particular topic or post content around a particular topic, with threads and replies. Quora has questions and answers, and a slightly hidden blogging feature.

Subreddits are communities of users on reddit and each subreddit has a particular focus. So /r/Games is about videogames and /r/scifi is about science fiction.

Quora’s topics are groupings of questions about particular subjects. You’ll find topics like Technology Trends or B2B Marketing.

Both platforms have the possibility to help with your content marketing efforts.

But what are the other main differences between the two sites?

(Click on image for a larger view.)

(What’s “astroturfing”? Check out this definition over on TechTarget.)

While there are many similarities between the two platforms, as you can see from this table there are a lot of differences too.

What could a B2B marketer use reddit for? (hint: it’s NOT promoting your own content)

There are many articles, blog posts, that describe how to use reddit to gain web traffic. Almost all of them involve concealing that you’re a marketer while doing this. They say you should embed yourself within reddit and in subreddits relevant to your business in order to build up a reputation as a “genuine poster” and then start to promote your business.

Do not do this.

What those articles don’t really mention is the fact that if you are found out, all that hard work you put into pretending to be genuine will have been for nothing and your brand’s reputation tarnished.

Or, as this article on SocialMediaExaminer points out:

redditors expect extreme transparency and authenticity from advertisers. Spam and hard selling aren’t tolerated and using either tactic will damage your brand’s reputation.

It doesn’t matter how awesome your content is. You can’t approach reddit the same way that you do Facebook, Twitter or Pinterest. If you jump in and submit content blindly, you could find yourself banned or your websites blacklisted.

Despite all this, paid-for ads that link to your content are perfectly acceptable. Why? Because you’re being honest that you’re marketing something.

So what should a B2B marketer use reddit for?

Outside of content promotion or starting a subreddit specifically for your brand?

You should use reddit for finding out about part of your audience.

I say part, because the users of reddit are, anecdotally, incredibly skewed towards a particular demographic (white, straight men who are under 40). But for B2B marketers looking to find out more about everyone from end-users to senior decision-makers, there are subreddits on almost anything related to industry and business.

For example, there’s subreddits like /r/sysadmin, /r/engineering and even /r/talesfromtechsupport.

Lurk and listen.

There are no quick fixes and it might take some time to find where you should be listening (the first part of that SME article has good advice on finding relevant subreddits). The benefit of listening is that you might discover ideas for content and ways to flesh out audience personas.

Can you try posting on reddit?

You have to be really careful about posting to reddit and linking to your brand in any way. When reddit advises you to “tread carefully” they really mean it.

If you decide to post, do as SocialMediaExaminer advises:

Submit appropriate content, provide insightful answers, ask questions related to your industry and respond to people who engage with you.

So what do you use Quora for?

Well, you use it to be yourself.

A lot of what you would do with Quora you could do with reddit. But Quora encourages you to be yourself:

Having profiles that are meant to be based on who you are gives Quora an edge that reddit doesn’t: Quora gives you a true public face as a user. This means you can do a lot more, because you can be honest about who you are from the start and build up a reputation that you can use to your brand’s benefit.

Ways to use Quora for B2B marketing

This article from Buffer’s Kevan Lee is an excellent guide on how to set up your Quora profile and how you can use the site as a marketer.

As Kevan suggests, here are just some of the things you can do with Quora:

  • Research a topic your business is interested in
  • Crowdsource content
  • “Re-answer questions you’ve answered in your blog”
  • Discover new content ideas based on questions

But its main strength for marketers is how public-facing it enables you to be, and the transparency that enables.

I’ve previously written on this blog that the impact of being truthful and authentic should never be underestimated; existing and potential customers appreciate it.

Quora is essentially a place where you can build a reputation as a thought leader and gently tie this back to your brand. This includes linking back to your existing content in answers when it’s relevant to do so.

We’ve even seen clients’ contributions to Quora discussions being quoted in the media, so it can be valuable from a PR point of view, as well. (As long as you’re saying something you’d be happy to see quoted!)

What about Quora’s blogging feature?

The blog feature is not nearly as prominent as some other self-publishing platforms, like LinkedIn’s Pulse. However, if you’re looking for somewhere you can atomise and reuse content then it has potential and helps to build up the authority of your Quora profile when people check it out.

reddit v Quora: which do you pick?

Like any online platform, the first part of looking into its marketing benefits is finding out whether your audience is there. If your audience isn’t on reddit or Quora, then you shouldn’t waste your time on the platforms, because they won’t help you bolster your marketing efforts.

But if your audience is on both and you only have time for one?

Then decide if you want a public profile or an anonymous profile.

Public brand building? Choose Quora.

Anonymous information gathering? Go with reddit.

But above all, remember: spam is not your friend.

(I don’t know if David is any less terrified of reddit after reading this post.)

Want more B2B copywriting and content advice?

Check out the Good Copy, Bad Copy podcast.

Header image adapted from “Daily News Golden Gloves Boxing” by Mike Lizzi under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.

5 questions with Joe Pulizzi: the problem of unused content

Marketers: have you ever paid a writer to produce a blog post, or an ebook, or a white paper… and then never used it? Even though it was perfectly serviceable and totally met your brief?

If so, you’re not alone. Far, far from it. As we discussed in our latest podcast, the stats about the amount of content that goes unused in B2B are, frankly, staggering.

  • In 2013, SiriusDecisions were the first to point out the elephant behind the sofa, infamously claiming that 60-70% of B2B marketing content doesn’t get used.
  • When Newscred’s Michael Brenner was working at SAP, he once discovered that 60% of marketing content produced for a single product had never been used.
  • And at a Forrester Sales Enablement Forum in 2015, GE Healthcare’s head of Marketing Operations apparently admitted: “82% of the content we’ve created has never been used.”

A massive waste of time and money?

It’s hard to put a figure on how much money is being wasted here, but Munya Hoto, SVP of marketing at content intelligence company idio, has had a go. He estimates that in 2014, globally, $50 billion (out of a total spend of $272 billion) was wasted on unused, B2B marketing content.

That’s a lot of wasted money, and a lot of wasted time. So what exactly is going on?

As copywriters working with many B2B tech brands, we regularly get a ringside view of content waste. A lot of the stuff we write – and clients pay for – just doesn’t see the light of day.

And not because we do a bad job, I hasten to add. Rather, there seem to be myriad things behind the scenes that conspire to prevent our lovingly crafted work from ever getting in front of its intended audience.

Joe Pulizzi has some answers

It’s frustrating as hell, and we wanted someone in the know to shed some light on the problem. So we put five burning questions to the one person who surely knows more than any other about content marketing, the Content Marketing Institute’s Joe Pulizzi.

Here are his insights:

Radix: We’ve seen stats suggesting 60-70% of content goes unused. Does that match your experience?

Joe Pulizzi: I’ve seen this statistic many times.  Sure, this is true in some organizations, but it’s also true for most content creators.  Raw content needs to be edited.  Some is used and some never should be.  I think the right number should be much less than 60%, but look at any movie or book that is created…the majority of content goes unused.  This is just part of the creative process.

Radix: What could stop a content asset seeing the light of day?

Joe: Outside of pure editing, there is much brand content that revolves around what the brand wants to say.  Much of that content should never be used.  It’s not about what we WANT to say…it’s about what our audience NEEDS to hear.  Often times content is created in an organization and we think there is a great reason for it, but as it moves closer to the audience we realize that it really services no audience purpose.

Radix: What’s the most bizarre reason you’ve seen or heard of for a piece of content not being used?

Joe: That a similar one has already been created.  This happens all the time and it saddens me.

Radix:  What can writers do to ensure that they’re creating a piece of content that will get used?

Joe: Make sure it’s part of the overall content marketing strategy.  Make sure it’s completely focused on the needs of the audience.  Make sure that it fills a current content gap.

Radix: What can marketers do to make sure they get the most from every piece of content?

Joe: Plan what you are going to use it for ahead of time.  Most brands don’t do this to be honest.

4 things that will make your content more usable

So there you have it: if you want your content piece to be used, make sure you can put a big tick against these four things:

  1. You know in advance how it will be used
  2. It says something your audience needs to hear
  3. You don’t already have something like it
  4. It fits with your content marketing strategy

And if you find you still have content going to waste: maybe stop stressing so much? Having stuff end up on the cutting room floor is all part of the creative process – filtering out the less good so that only the best stuff makes the final cut.

With many thanks to Joe for taking the time to reply to our questions, and for his eminently practical and sensible advice. Thanks Joe!

Make the most of your content

If you want B2B content that your audience wants to engage with – get in touch.

Research report: barriers to B2B marketing content

In November 2019, we invited B2B marketers to tell us, anonymously, about the problems that prevent them creating the content they’d like. We write B2B content, so we thought we might learn something useful.

The response was so surprising, and so vehement, that we turned it into a full research report – and we asked leading B2B marketers from the US, UK, Germany, and the Netherlands to share their commentary and advice.

It reveals six problems shared by at least 75% of marketers, as well as six ideas to break the cycle. If you want to dive straight in, you can do so here…

Click to read Barriers to Great B2B Content 2020: Survey Results and Analysis

Big surprises in the survey results

The response to the survey shocked us, in a whole bunch of ways.

Responses from all kinds of B2B marketers, everywhere

First, the number and variety of marketers who took part. We’d anticipated that maybe a few dozen would be disgruntled enough to use our survey to let off steam. In fact, we attracted 105 responses – B2B content marketers of all levels, from all round the world. CMOs and marketing directors to content writers and agency types, working in all kinds of B2B: tech, engineering, SaaS, legal, manufacturing, and more.

B2B marketers are really, really angry about this stuff

Second, the sheer vehemence of the answers. These aren’t just small frustrations; B2B content marketers are angry. And when you think about it, it’s hardly surprising; marketers are being prevented from doing their best work, and then being talked down to by content experts who only see the content, but not the struggle behind it.

Maureen Blandford has experienced this in previous roles, and says the results are “the reality for most marketers”.

Imagine having people screwing your work up, and then being blamed by the market when your content sucks. It’s like: “If you only fuckin’ knew.”

– Maureen Blandford, VP of
Marketing, Community Brands

Pretty much everyone is dealing with the same crap

Third, the fact they’re largely angry about exactly the same things. Irrespective of seniority, business size, sector or location, there are issues that seem to affect everyone. Specifically, six challenges were rated as a problem by 75% or more of our respondents:

  1. Conflicting and changing priorities, and unclear briefs
  2. Stakeholder interference
  3. Limited budgets and resources
  4. Too much work, and not enough time
  5. Lack of co-operation from other departments
  6. Problems getting access to customers

All the assumptions about B2B marketing are wrong

Fourth, the challenges that aren’t on that list. We often read that B2B content is not engaging because the subject matter is complex and dry, B2B buyers are conservative, or marketers lack creative skills. None of those things made the list. Instead, we see a picture of B2B marketers who have plenty of good ideas, but are prevented from executing them by their own organisations.

And finally, a lot of the findings are shocking in their own right. For example…

Just 32% of B2B marketers are proud of most of their content.

Many of the critiques of B2B content seem to assume that marketers don’t know their content could be better. This result – in response to the question “How much of your published B2B content makes you proud?” – proves that’s a huge mis-assessment.

Out of 105 respondents, not one could say they’re proud of all the content they produce; only 32% could even say “most of it”. By contrast, the most popular response was “a handful, ever” (37%). 28% went for “less than half”, and 3% said “none”.

It’s a worrying state of affairs, replicated in every group we spoke to. CMOs and marketers in North America were slightly more positive, but there was no category where “most of it” scored higher than 45%.

81% of B2B marketers have to fight hard for their content.

And the issue certainly isn’t that stakeholders don’t care. 81% agreed with the statement, “I sometimes have to fight hard to publish content I’m happy with.”

That’s a global issue, and the scores were fairly uniform. There was no category where fewer than 73% agreed (the UK, followed by tech marketers with 76%), and for marketers working in enterprises and on mainland Europe, the figure was 100%.

Just 14% of B2B marketers say their organisation agrees on what good content is.

Conversely, no enterprise or European marketer agreed with the statement, “In my organisation, everybody agrees on what good content is.” Overall, the figure was just 14%.

The fact the figure is almost an exact mirror image of the “I sometimes have to fight…” question could suggest that a lack of stakeholder alignment could be one of the root issues revealed in this report. If the organisation cannot agree what good content looks like, then the marketer will always face a fruitless task trying to create it.

In the report, Doug Kessler talks about stakeholder alignment as “the number one job” for B2B marketers. And he explains the importance of taking that alignment work outside of the daily process of content approvals.

If your stakeholders are not in alignment, nothing is possible. And if they are, almost anything is.

– Doug Kessler, Creative Director, Velocity Partners

One way to address the issue is to draw up a clear, agreed specification for your content, and base each point on data (whether from research or, better still, your own A/B testing). If you can use independent metrics like content readability scoring, better still. This makes the conversation less subjective, and more aligned to the pass/fail quality tests in other areas of your business.

If you like, you’re more than welcome to steal the B2B content quality checklist we use for our own internal reviews, and adapt it for your own purposes.

There’s evidence these content barriers really do hurt business results.

As we looked at the research, it quickly became clear that B2B marketers aren’t lacking inspiration for their content; they need evidence to help them fight their daily stakeholder battles. So we went back to the data, to see what we could find.

We cross-referenced some of the bigger problems marketers were reporting with the answers to the question, “What is it about your best content that makes you proud?”

It’s not absolute proof, but we can show the impact of each problem on marketers’ perceptions of their own content, based on whether they were more or less likely to be proud of that aspect, compared to the average.

And this is where things get really interesting:

Excessive stakeholder interference makes B2B content 26% less likely to get good business results.

Ever thought that all that micro-management from stakeholders was actually making your content less effective? Turns out, you were quite possibly right.

Respondents who reported stakeholder interference as a big problem were 26% less likely to be proud of their content’s business results than the overall average.

Tight marketing budgets make content less effective. (Heavy workloads makes it less creative.)

The theme continues among marketers who said lack of budget and resources were a big issue; they were 18% less likely to be proud of their content’s business results.

There was also a marked decrease in pride about original concepts, and quality of copywriting – which suggests that cheap content has a knock-on effect on business outcomes.

A similar pattern occurs among people who said workload is a big issue: they’re 25% less likely to say they’re proud of their best content’s originality, with a commensurate impact on results. It suggests that having insufficient time ties marketers to tried-and-tested concepts, at the expense of cut-through.

B2B marketers who can’t talk to customers are 27% less likely to be happy with their content’s business results.

Our sixth barrier was possibly the most surprising: marketers around the world are being kept away from customers, meaning they don’t have a clear view of their priorities, needs, and language.

This is obviously a painful issue, as the respondents overwhelmingly believed that giving the reader value, and reflecting the customer’s point of view, were the most important aspects of good B2B content.

As you might expect, marketers who say this is a big problem are 24% less likely to be proud of their content’s customer alignment. But here’s the surprising thing: the impact is even greater on business results (27% lower).

That’s reflected in a comment from Intel content marketing and automation analyst Shaema Shazleen Katib, who says: “Our best-performing content has that credibility factor, things like statistics, customer success stories, and testimonies. These things have always performed the best on a global scale.”

What’s important is finding the right format, length, structure, and tone – and that’s a matter of knowing your audience well enough.

– Shaema Shazleen Katib, Intel

59% of B2B marketers say their own signoff process makes results worse. (And the really shocking part? They’re right.)

Here’s a crazy thing: almost 6 out of 10 B2B marketers think their organisation’s own signoff processes actively impairs content outcomes. In fact, 59% agreed with the statement, “If nobody else had to sign off our content, the results would be a lot better.”

And here’s a crazier thing: the research agrees with them. People who agreed with the statement were less likely to be proud of their content, right across the board:

  • Writing quality: -8%
  • Business results: -8%
  • Customer alignment: -6%
  • Marketing prestige: -15%
  • Emotional impact: -19%
  • Value for reader: -5%

Time to break the B2B content cycle.

Sooner or later, the six barriers to B2B content come down to a single fact: in many B2B organisations, marketing does not get the respect it needs to work effectively.

The irony is that good content can be part of the solution: 86% of respondents agree that “Great content makes the marketing team look good”. But until marketing gets that respect, that content can’t happen: just 20% say their best content reflected well on the marketing team.

In the back of the report, we discuss six approaches which might help. First among them is getting away from the idea that good content and effective content are two different things.

56% of respondents disagreed with the statement “The best content usually gets the best results”, and Doug Kessler thinks this is the heart of the problem. Marketing will continue to be underestimated until marketers’ objectives align with the rest of the organisation. As Doug says: “What’s great, what’s effective, and what’s wonderful should be the same thing.”

There shouldn’t be this tension between the well-crafted, beautiful content and the effective content. If we don’t start by defining great content as that which has the most impact, we’re never going to succeed.

– Doug Kessler, Creative Director, Velocity Partners

Ultimately, the fight is yours.

Please feel free to use this report however best helps you to win the argument for good content. Share it with stakeholders, write blogs, whatever works.

Because unless we can change the conversation around B2B content and what good looks like, marketers will continue to have to fight their own organisations, just to get effective work done.

(And selfishly, as B2B content writers, that’s no fun for us either.)

We should be shouting these results from the rooftops. Because if marketers aren’t delighted with the work they’re doing, we need to show why.

– Maureen Blandford, VP of
Marketing, Community Brands

 

Three ways AI is helping improve animal welfare

As a longtime fan of dystopian science fiction like The Matrix and Metal Gear Solid, I’ve always found AI to be a compelling, if somewhat unsettling, concept. That’s why, despite those cautionary tales, AI is consistently surprising me as a force for good.

Whether it’s generative AI being used to enhance medical research or computer vision helping athletes track and analyse their performance, I currently spend a lot of time writing about how AI can help people work smarter, and more safely and efficiently.

While it’s all fascinating to learn about, for me, here’s one application that resonates much more than the others. It may not seem like the most obvious use case, but AI is already playing a key role in humanity’s efforts to improve animal welfare – and the more I learn, the more it makes sense.

In this blog, I’ll look at three ways AI is helping make life a little better, if not more dignified, for wildlife and livestock. But before we dive in…

A quick guide to the tech

Were you confidently nodding along when I mentioned generative AI and computer vision? If those terms make sense to you, feel free skip to this section. If not, then read on.

Generative AI refers to models that can learn from existing content – like the collected works of William Gibson, or the films of Ridley Scott – to create new text, images, video, and synthetic data.

Computer vision (CV) is a field of AI in which algorithms are continuously trained using visual data to recognise objects and people. This helps it spot and respond to pre-defined patterns and behaviours.

Eager to learn more about AI? Be sure to read my colleague George’s blog about synthetic data, and Katy’s deep dive into AI’s applications in healthcare.

Use case #1: Protecting British wildlife on Network Rail

Network Rail (NR) and the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) – a science-driven conservation charity – are working with Google Cloud to identify, monitor, and learn more about wildlife living in and around the 52,000 hectares of land owned by NR.

Together, ZSL’s Machine Learning (ML) image processing systems and Google Cloud’s advanced data analytics enable NR’s ecologists to rapidly survey wildlife, map their behavioural trends and take protective action at scale.

Connected sensors capture huge amounts of audio and visual information in key wildlife areas. AI tools are then used to analyse the data and inform decisions regarding how to best protect different species.

So far, the initiative has helped track and protect endangered hazel dormice living along the edge of railways in the south of England, and many bat and bird species in and around London – including the rather lovely Eurasian blackcap. It’s also helped NR identify the best places to create “hedgehog highways” on its lines, helping the spiky lads cross over safely.

As climate change drives many species to find new habitats, ZSL and NR plan to use AI to monitor and safeguard their migration without disrupting railway operations. The project’s conservationists also expect AI will soon help them better manage vegetation alongside railways and on road verges to encourage biodiversity.

It’s nice to see organisations working together to protect these creatures, and it’s sure to help boost NR’s reputation with some passengers and investors. You can learn more about the initiative here.

Use Case #2: Observing livestock welfare for healthy herds

The National Farmers’ Union says animal welfare is a high priority for all British farmers, and while there are many RSPCA-assured farms, less than 3% of UK farms are inspected by official Government bodies each year.

There are also more than 1,000 “US-style mega-farms” in the UK, and they can become extremely crowded. These are the most likely candidates for animal mistreatment, given the aggressive turnaround on production and limited space.

It’s often difficult for vets, cattle consultants, and farm advisors to tell what’s happening behind closed doors. Plus, even with the best intentions, farmers may struggle to keep manual track of every animal’s wellbeing.

This is where computer vision and AI-powered analytics can help. Automatic image detection and analysis solutions can provide remote, AI-enhanced livestock surveillance 24/7 – to everyone who needs it.

Non-intrusive cameras are installed in strategic farming areas, providing a live video feed  augmented with on-screen visuals that indicate each animal’s current status, behaviour, and risk level.

Machine learning algorithms continually monitor and analyse the footage, including user responses, to more accurately identify when an animal is at risk or action must be taken to optimise their environment. To achieve this, the AI is taught to recognise and assess the environment’s brightness and humidity, and even animals’ faces and vocalisations.

Users can pre-define scenarios that they want the AI to alert them to, such as abnormal animal activity, whether cows are lying down enough, if their stalls are comfortable, and when food or water is running low.

AI-powered monitoring solutions can also help farmers and vets identify sick animals, predict emerging health issues, and analyse behavioural patterns that are indicative of an animal’s wellbeing. This information can improve farming productivity too, ensuring animals are kept in conditions conducive to safe and efficient pasture and growth.

Use case #3: Reducing avoidable animal suffering in slaughterhouses

Animal welfare organisations The Dutch Society for the Protection of Animals and Eyes on Animals, meat producer Vion, and professional services giant Deloitte have teamed up to develop AI4Animals – an intelligent animal surveillance system.

Their mission is to “significantly reduce avoidable and unnecessary animal suffering through innovative technology”. The solution uses AI to continuously monitor how animals are being handled in slaughterhouses, and alert those in charge of animal welfare to any signs of mistreatment or deviation from regulated protocol.

AI4Animals says many major slaughterhouses lack the time and resources to assess footage captured by traditional camera monitoring solutions. With AI, every frame is analysed in real-time using a rules-based criteria to detect handling issues, such as:

  • People causing stress by walking directly against the direction of the pigs
  • Animals remaining idle due to possible exhaustion or injury
  • Inappropriate use of mobile stunners as defined by regulatory protocol

There are other issues it can detect, but they turn my stomach – so I’ll leave those out for both of our sakes. Should the AI detect an issue, users can manually review any flagged footage to confirm mistreatment or a false positive. The AI will also compile regular reports to help outline deviations in behaviour over time, and inform decisions at a more strategic level.

Will this technology catch on?

During my research for this blog, I came across an article exploring the use of AI to detect distress in pigs. It’s already able to do this with 92% accuracy compared to human assessment.

While it’s true that happy animals tend to be more productive, and calmer animals are easier to handle, it’s questionable whether all producers of animal products are ready to embrace such technologies. By monitoring the emotions of livestock, you also acknowledge their existence and importance. Some industry commentators believe producers will resist this shift, fearing the imposition of new regulations that diminish the profitability of their operations.

It’s grim to think that people may ignore such promising technology because it risks humanising animals and harming profits, and I can only hope it does inspire more meaningful change across the industry.

In the meantime, the solutions explored in this blog are already driving meaningful change, and while I may not like industrial farming, if AI can help the animals live out happier, more dignified lives – I’m all for it.